• 92 Posts
  • 15 Comments
Joined 2Y ago
cake
Cake day: Apr 18, 2022

help-circle
rss

To reduce the visibility of content from a specific federated instance in Lemmy, you could implement a weighting system for content in the user’s feed. This would allow the user to specify that they want to see less content from a specific instance, while still allowing them to see some content from that instance.

To implement this feature, you would need to:

  1. Add a weighting option in the user settings for instances
  2. Store the weight for each instance for each user in the database
  3. Modify the feed-generating code to apply the weight to posts from that instance for that user. For example, if a user has set a weight of 50% for an instance, only half of the posts from that instance would appear in their feed.

This would allow users to control the visibility of content from specific instances in their feed without completely blocking it.


I don’t like this. There are some instances like Lemmy.ml that may want more of some kind of content, in it’s case FOSS and Privacy communities. This way you would force all instances to be about all topics equally. I personally don’t like to see so much Shit Reactionaries Say posts from Lemmygrad.ml on Lemmy.ml but while this would fix that, it creates a bigger problem than what it’s fixing. There has to be a better way.

What I would like is for users to be able to give communities a weight in the form of 0-100 points represented as 0 to 5 stars and get an amount of posts from each community in their feed proportional to the weight. Otherwise assign a weight automatically to each community based on each user interactions with the posts in the community as a percentage of upvotes vs downvotes. If this would require too much computation then it could be the same but getting the community rating from the average of each user rating for that community. Alternatively only take into account the admins rating and that way the instance is personalized according only to the admin preferences and not the users. But this could make community subscriptions redundant, so it’s probably not the best idea.


The main proposal on Github is to make the visibility equal for all communities by making the weight inversely proportional to the monthly or weekly active users.


How to reduce visibility for some instances or communities?
I've seen [an issue](https://github.com/LemmyNet/lemmy/issues/1026) on Github about how > It's hard to see posts from smaller communities when you are also subscribed to larger communities. What are your ideas on how this could be accomplished?
fedilink

Help us collect data for OpenAssistant, the largest and most open alternative to ChatGPT. open-assistant.io
fedilink


deleted by creator



How to write a superscript citation in markdown?
Like this or the closest similar way ``` Text^[1][link]^. [link]: https://lemmy.ml ``` Output: Text^[1][link]^. [link]: https://lemmy.ml
fedilink

deleted by creator


deleted by creator


deleted by creator


deleted by creator



deleted by creator


deleted by creator


deleted by creator


deleted by creator




deleted by creator


deleted by creator


deleted by creator





How can I process monero payments automatically using onion routing?
I'm making a rust app and I don't have any idea of how to do this or even if it's possible. I'm not asking for specifics on how to program this which is why I don't think this fits in the rust sublemmy.
fedilink



...
.
fedilink






Do all p2p protocols require a list of addresses to connect to more peers? Where to find them?
I'm using mldonkey which supports many p2p protocols. For the edonkey protocol it required a `server.met.gz` file to connect to more servers. Do I need something like that for the rest of the netwroks? overnet, kademlia, bittorrent, opennap, soulseek, gnutella, gnutella2, fasttrack, directconnect, fileTP.
fedilink



According to a new poll from the University of Chicago’s Institute of Politics, almost a third say it may soon be necessary to "take up arms against the government". Two-thirds of Republicans and independents say the government is corrupt and out to get them. That’s compared to 51 percent of liberal voters. Of course, these findings come after a House committee investigating the Jan. 6 riots at the U.S. Capitol wrapped up it’s final hearing. What this poll clearly shows, is that the division between conservatives and liberals across the country is only growing. Half of all Americans believe the other side is misinformed about politics because of where they get their news from. And they also believe that the other side want to impose those same beliefs on them. There is very little chance of any meaningful reconciliation happening in the foreseeable future, at least any that would help to bridge this divide.
fedilink