Which countries? The article only mentions the United States. Is this something like the “World Series”? Doesnt belong on !worldnews@lemmy.ml in my opinion.
doesn’t worldwide just mean news from countries all over the world (including the us), doesn’t necessarily have to be anything specific that applies to all countries worldwide, no?
It does include comments from WHO that are not specific to the US:
The World Health Organization on Thursday pushed back against the consistent chatter that the ultra-transmissible omicron coronavirus is “mild,” noting that the variant is causing a “tsunami of cases” that is “overwhelming health systems around the world.”
Which countries? The article only mentions the United States. Is this something like the “World Series”? Doesnt belong on !worldnews@lemmy.ml in my opinion.
doesn’t worldwide just mean news from countries all over the world (including the us), doesn’t necessarily have to be anything specific that applies to all countries worldwide, no?
It also says “W[orld]H[ealth]O[rganisation] warns” - seems OK imo.
Okay but then the title is completely misleading, because it says “worldwide”. So you could say that the title is misinformation.
yeah, title is not appropriate, if not misleading, it’s definitely incomplete
@uthredii@lemmy.ml could you please change the post title to remove “worldwide”, and mention that its about the United States?
@AgreeableLandscape@lemmy.ml Maybe the community could have a rule that the title must accurately reflect the content of the article?
I would prefer not to change the title because:
It does include comments from WHO that are not specific to the US:
The post title is the same as the article title.
I’ll make a post soon asking for feedback on how “world news” should be defined, extending that old thread we had on that.