India To Buy More Russia Oil, Working On Rupee-Ruble Settlement Mechanism;
tradeforprofit.netIndia To Buy More Russia Oil, Working On Rupee-Ruble Settlement Mechanism; West "Understands" In the
You must log in or register to comment.
News from around the world!
Rules:
-
Please only post links to actual news sources, no tabloid sites, etc
-
No NSFW content
-
No hate speech, bigotry, propaganda, etc
- 0 users online
- 18 users / day
- 26 users / week
- 27 users / month
- 24 users / 6 months
- 17 subscribers
- 872 Posts
- 2.02K Comments
- Modlog
A good twitter thread about it: https://nitter.42l.fr/anshgupta64/status/1502899116900499457
Good, hopefully Eastern alliance can stop the global bullying by the Atlantic hegemon dictator.
Poor source.
would you prefer Reuters? https://www.reuters.com/world/india/india-considers-buying-discounted-russian-oil-commodities-officials-say-2022-03-14/
Reuters has this nasty-assed paywall I only noticed just the other day. Not sure if it’s new or if I just somehow managed to miss it.
12ft ladder is a nice proxy that works with most paywalls I find https://12ft.io/proxy?q=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.reuters.com%2Fworld%2Findia%2Findia-considers-buying-discounted-russian-oil-commodities-officials-say-2022-03-14%2F
I prefer scientific journalism. I need some proper document or some video. I don’t trust Aftab Ahmed, Manoj Kumar and Krishna Das. As far as I know, India already has bought cheap oil when last oil prices went down in covid. India bought futures then. Also, Mukesh Ambani, an Indian investor has quite some stake in Aramco. Ofc, it can be but not over words of some people whose job is to print such stories. I prefer being uncertain.
What is this scientific journalism you talk about? Statements by official authorities told unfiltered is journalism.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_journalism
I did not ask for definitions, but the ethicality of the journalism process of linked article you questioned in this thread. It does not look questionable at all, so, why did you call it that?
According to current practices, it isn’t unethical. However according to the standards of Scientific journalism, it is just a statement given by 3 people and is a poor source.