Nope, tons of non-copyleft licenses are considered free software even by the FSF, so they fit both the open source and free software definition, which makes them FOSS.
Also, take into account that FOSS is not a thing by itself, but rather a grouping of software that meets two ideologies: open source and free software
As far as I know, Odysee and LBRY.TV have lots of trackers: they are in no way privacy respecting. I think their stance is more about “freedom of speech”.
E2EE doesn’t mean servers are not used for storage, it only means servers can’t see message contents.
Note that this doesn’t mean that Olvid uses no servers (it does). It means that you do not have to trust them: your privacy is ensured by cryptographic protocols running on the client-side (i.e., on your device), and these protocols assume that the servers were compromised from day one. Even then, your privacy is ensured blush.
From the comments of that Hackaday article: https://bitsex.net/english/2021/kodachi-linux-is-probably-not-secure/
Finally, a worthy opponent for the aging and terribly designed Linkbucket.
EDIT: no, I refuse to let Linkbucket die! I need to rework some of it.
Probably because it’s not free (as in freedom) software. https://olvid.io/faq/is-olvid-open-source/
EDIT: the downvote wasn’t mine.
Hey, I wanted to see at least a single screenshot. :(