FOSS stands for “free and open source software”, and in practice, free software is almost the same as open source, so I don’t get why you say it’s open source but not FOSS. Don’t you mean source-available?
FOSS also involves licensing software so that modifications remain libre in the foreseeable future. Same reason why Android or Chromium might be open-source but aren’t exactly considered FOSS.
Nope, tons of non-copyleft licenses are considered free software even by the FSF, so they fit both the open source and free software definition, which makes them FOSS.
Also, take into account that FOSS is not a thing by itself, but rather a grouping of software that meets two ideologies: open source and free software
FOSS stands for “free and open source software”, and in practice, free software is almost the same as open source, so I don’t get why you say it’s open source but not FOSS. Don’t you mean source-available?
FOSS also involves licensing software so that modifications remain libre in the foreseeable future. Same reason why Android or Chromium might be open-source but aren’t exactly considered FOSS.
Nope, tons of non-copyleft licenses are considered free software even by the FSF, so they fit both the open source and free software definition, which makes them FOSS.
Also, take into account that FOSS is not a thing by itself, but rather a grouping of software that meets two ideologies: open source and free software