When it comes to the state of packaged web browsers for Debian GNU/Linux, unfortunately it leaves a lot to be desired at the moment and for those wanting to be secure and up-to-date it can mean resorting to proprietary or un-packaged browser builds.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).
Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word “Linux” in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.
Rules
- Posts must be relevant to operating systems running the Linux kernel. GNU/Linux or otherwise.
- No misinformation
- No NSFW content
- No hate speech, bigotry, etc
Related Communities
Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0
- 0 users online
- 5 users / day
- 20 users / week
- 27 users / month
- 16 users / 6 months
- 20 subscribers
- 684 Posts
- 1.7K Comments
- Modlog
I’m a long time Debian user and this is not the first time ESR are delayed
What is the difficulty to use the official archive from mozilla?
sudo tar -xjvf firefox-XX.tar.bz2 -C /opt && ln -sf /opt/firefox/firefox ~/.local/bin/If ESR is a problem to you, which was not to me, tbh.
The post is funny because nearly 2 months ago Firefox ESR had 2 versions as maintained (and you could choose which one you download from an advanced form) and a month ago, with the release of Firefox ESR 91.3.0, the branch for 78 was deprecated.
In the Debian tracker, the Firefox ESR package upgrade seems stuck by a different reason that the one listed there, it is waiting for tests (not mentioned) to be passed in order to migrate to the last ESR.
A major release distro doesn’t prevent bugs, it just keeps the amount of bugs the same. This is good for servers, but I’m a big proponent for rolling-release desktops since fixes usually take a week or two max.
I had a few problems with that on Debian. But, my current favorite 3 (Brave, FF, and LibreWolf) all do fine. If the Debian staff are required to look at the code and dependencies or compatibility of all software in their repos, then…well, time and money run out… My understanding is that Debian is the most stable distro because they are more careful or conservative. There are other distros for you if you like living dangerously. Let’s try not to remake every distro to fit our whims. Just change distros. Try looking at flatpaks and appimages for those other browsers. Sadly, flatpak is acquainted with RedHat (BigTech), I think. I think appimages are rather independent, though.
Flatpak and appimage are far from a security improvement. The real solution is for upstream developers to release software that is not incredibly difficult to build and provide security fixes for.
True.
Sure, FF codebase is a beast, should it really take 1year to 1to5 moz engineer to refactor the build process?
Expensive? Reduce the salary of the CEO and marketing’s budget for 1 year (at least).