What do you call someone who tells a warring nation targeting information for the purpose of killing or otherwise destroying an enemy force or structure? A combatant.
I know why this is. The media is controlled by the ruling class and therefore has certain interests, I understand that. But I don’t want to always have to go through six obscure Telegram groups, 26 different news outlets, YouTube, Reddit and three prayers to different Gods to find answers on what’s really happening. Shit’s tiring yo
So much of the problem too is the editors, not the actual journalists. When news on Bucha broke mainstream, many articles reported that there was no conclusive evidence on who was responsible for the massacres. But people don’t read articles. They read headlines. And the editor is responsible for the headline. When the article says one thing but the headline says “Mass Grave discovered after Russian Troops Leave” then the damage is already done.
For posting news about NATO’s wars in Ukraine, Serbia, Kosovo, and The Middle East, including anywhere else NATO is currently engaged in hostile actions. As well as anything that relates to it.
Rules:
Follow Site Rules
No support nor defence of Western-backed governments, NATO or Western Imperialism
I know why this is. The media is controlled by the ruling class and therefore has certain interests, I understand that. But I don’t want to always have to go through six obscure Telegram groups, 26 different news outlets, YouTube, Reddit and three prayers to different Gods to find answers on what’s really happening. Shit’s tiring yo
So much of the problem too is the editors, not the actual journalists. When news on Bucha broke mainstream, many articles reported that there was no conclusive evidence on who was responsible for the massacres. But people don’t read articles. They read headlines. And the editor is responsible for the headline. When the article says one thing but the headline says “Mass Grave discovered after Russian Troops Leave” then the damage is already done.