I’ve recently tried to use peertube and I think it could improve a lot if it showed all the content in all instances.
The policy of different PeerTube instances differs greatly therefore a lot of admins decide to federate with a limited number of instances. This also has an advantage. I’m on the LinuxRocks instances and it only federates with tech oriented instances. This keeps the instance clean of a lot of unwanted content. BTW: A user can still add interesting channels to it’s PeerTube account that show up for the user only.
Here is a link to an article what to expect from v4: https://framablog.org/2021/11/30/peertube-v4-more-power-to-help-you-present-your-videos/
Good analysis and possible solutions. I was working on a video about the same topic but that seems a bit superfluous now. A couple of remarks.
IMO TILvids is the instance with the best content by far (I’m sorry). The reason is that the admin or host is very active both in attracting content creators and promoting content within the Fediverse. I’m not saying that instances like diode.zone, share.tube and spectra.video are bad. Not at all but the TILvids approach could be an example for other hosts (except for the part that they are not federating with other instances). Too many admins start a PeerTube instance and don’t seem to bother about it any more.
Also almost all (good) content creators on PeerTube are also on YT. This gives viewers little incentive to watch on PeerTube. If PeerTube hosts can somehow convince content creators to leave YT that would be a big win. But I’m afraid that currently only YT can make that happen since YT is it’s own biggest threat.
I’ve also noticed some improvement in content lately. A year ago almost everything on my instance trending page was old content but now I see recent content of proper quality.
Joseph Stalin did his best to even the score. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joseph_Stalin#Death_toll_and_accusations_of_genocide